Addressing the Executive Gap in P&L Understanding

by Julie M. LaNasa

One of the major issues across all industries today is a cultural focus on volume gains without proper attention given to the impact on profitability. Time and again we see companies achieve volume gains only to find themselves blindsided by erosion of profitability. For example, promotion or marketing costs to achieve volume gains are not adequately considered and evaluated before launching new initiatives to achieve growth. Or executives may try to use price as a lever to grow the topline, but do not adequately think about volume declines which could easily erode incremental gains made in sales.

Even worse, we see companies repeat these mistakes, which led us to question why this cycle repeats itself. We interviewed several companies and discovered that a lack of profitability understanding is like the elephant in the boardroom that no one wants to mention. This is the common refrain we heard. "You'd be amazed at the lack of P&L knowledge in the executive levels of my company. It is difficult for some to admit that they don't have these skills and out of embarrassment they avoid P&L impact analysis or fail to ask the important questions when evaluating everyday business decisions."

Discomfort and embarrassment over a lack of P&L understanding is a sensitive and ultimately dangerous issue for many companies. But it doesn't need to be. The reality is there are many different routes and succession models that lead individuals to climb the corporate ladder and not all of them require a detailed knowledge on the mechanics of the P&L. This diversity makes sense and is a great contribution to the collective skill base of the management team. So there is no reason to stigmatize individuals who get to higher executive positions without P&L skills. If the corporate culture did not provide this training, there is no reason why executives should be expected to have acquired it.

But neither should you ignore this disparity in skill level. A shared understanding of how to test profitability impact by the entire executive team is critical to avoid the pitfalls discussed above. Avoiding this critical business analysis out of fear will consistently produce a volume focus without a balanced perspective on profitability. You need to address this variation in skill level head on and get the management team as a whole to understand how to test P&L impact of strategic initiatives and take collective responsibility for it.

So how do you do this when people are predisposed to be embarrassed or unwilling to admit that they don't have these skills?

Cultural changes to support this work should begin by de-stigmatizing the lack of skills. Management should acknowledge that everyone has come from different backgrounds and strengths and admit that profitability understanding varies among the team for natural reasons and is not the by-product of individual weakness.

Next, the management team needs to build a burning platform for a greater focus on profitability analysis. A look at recent volume gains that have caused losses in profitability would help focus the need to balance volume and share goals with profitability analysis.

Once the need for profitability analysis is recognized a training program is necessary to help everyone get on the same page. Although there may be varying levels of understanding, there are always new and provoking issues that come out of scenario analysis from which all team members can benefit.

One way to initiate training would be to launch a company wide initiative that focuses on changing the culture to take P&L responsibility. As part of the process, the management team would be required to review some basics so that they can understand the training that will be initiated with their functional teams. This way you can schedule a basic review of profitability without isolating certain individuals or calling attention to perceived weaknesses.

On an ongoing basis, executives should be encouraged to ask questions about how to measure P&L impact, especially when they are having difficulty understanding or identifying the impact of current decisions. Also, do not let those with superior P&L knowledge use it as a weapon to win arguments or inhibit fundamental questions about driving assumptions. P&L analysis should always be done with an eye to educating everyone about the implications of decisions, not to intimidate executives who have fewer competences in that area.

Finally, changes in behavior and willingness to acquire P&L skills must be tied to performance measures and compensation. The best way to incent people to understand and conduct the new analysis is to make sure they are accountable to the desired outcomes.

De-stigmatizing the profitability knowledge gap, providing skill training to understand profitability trade-offs and rewarding for successful achievement of profitability targets can turn your companies volume focus around. By balancing volume with profitability, your company will create a more stable foundation for sustainable long-term growth.


Julie LaNasa is the founder and principal of Collaborative Consulting. In addition to helping drive profitability, understanding, and accountability throughout organizations, Julie works with a broad range of clients on strategy development, marketing and sales planning, and development of cross-functional customer teams. For further information contact Julie at ccjmlanasa@aol.com

Back to Top

 
For an AMA Training Consultant or to Register: 1-800-262-9699
American Management Association © Copyright 1997-2010
1601 Broadway New York, NY 10019
Phone: 212-586-8100 • Fax: 212-903-8168 • Customer Service: 1-800-262-9699